Warning: Declaration of AVH_Walker_Category_Checklist::walk($elements, $max_depth) should be compatible with Walker::walk($elements, $max_depth, ...$args) in /home/tasman92/public_html/wp-content/plugins/extended-categories-widget/4.2/class/avh-ec.widgets.php on line 0 Author: Sarah Lloyd | Tasmanian Geographic
Sarah Lloyd is a Tasmanian naturalist, writer and photographer whose passion for natural history began in early childhood with a love of birds. In 2008 Sarah initiated 'A Sound Idea', a project to monitor bush birds using digital sound recorders and numerous volunteers who have made (and continue to make) recordings from Tasman Island to King Island and about 100 locations in between. Her interests have broadened in recent decades to include plants, fungi, invertebrates and bryophytes. In 2010 Sarah started exploring the little-known world of myxomycetes (also known as plasmodial or acellular slime moulds) in the wet eucalypt forest that surrounds her home at Birralee in Northern Tasmania.
What seems amazing about Australian pelicans (Pelecanus conspicillatus) is not that they fly far from water, but that such bulky birds can fly at all. Like other birds, however, they are superbly adapted to their lifestyle with some fascinating internal structures and interesting strategies for weight reduction.
Birds’ bones, unlike the bones of mammals that are filled with marrow, must be light enough for flight. They are pneumatic (i.e. filled with air) and the lifestyle of the bird – how much it flies or dives – determines the degree of pneumatisation. Pelicans, therefore, are not nearly as heavy as they appear. Their skeleton is more pneumatic than that of other birds and weighs a mere 10% of their total body weight of around 5 kg. Relative to their size, pelicans are among the lightest birds. The Australian pelican, although not the largest of the eight pelican species that occur worldwide, boasts the longest bill.
Australian pelicans have huge wingspans of 2.4 metres. To conserve energy they sometimes glide low over water, taking advantage of the ‘ground effect’ whereby extra lift is provided by air funnelled between wings and water. They are unable to sustain long periods of flapping flight, but can stay airborne for 24 hours, riding the thermals and reaching stunning heights of 3000 meters. From such elevations they can keep a lookout for productive waterways and suitable places to breed.
There are several breeding colonies on the Bass Strait Islands but they are miniscule compared with the massive ones that occur periodically on some of the ephemeral lakes and wetlands on the Australian mainland. In June 2000, for instance, 7500 Australian pelicans were counted at the Mandora Marsh in Western Australia, a wetland that may flood only once a decade. For breeding to be successful pelicans must be assured of an undisturbed site that is rich enough to provide food for their growing chicks for at least three months. Unfortunately, the Bass Strait Island colonies are so close to the Tasmanian mainland that they are prone to disturbance from unwelcome visitors.
Pelicans sit high in the water. Their buoyancy is achieved by a special layer resembling bubble wrap that lies under the thin skin of most of their body. Because they float so high, they generally feed in shallow water and often in cooperation with other pelicans. Gatherings of nearly 2000 birds have been observed herding fish, concentrating shoals into a small area before scooping them up with their massive pouches. They are opportunistic feeders and will eat fish, crustaceans, ducklings or gulls and even the occasional small dog!
Pelicans have yet another strategy for weight reduction: if disturbance requires a rapid getaway, they can completely disgorge their stomachs which shrink to walnut size. Then they slowly flap their wings and with their totipalmate feet (i.e. with all four toes connected by webs) treading in unison on the surface of the water, they laboriously take off, before once again achieving mastery of the air.
Images provided by Dr. Eric Woehlor
Article courtesy of:
Further reading: – Amonline – Parks Tasmania (.pdf) – Halse, S.A., Pearson, G.B., Hassell, C., Collins, P., Scanlon, M.D. Minton, C.D.T. (2005) Mandora Marsh, north-western Australia, an arid zone wetland maintaining continental populations of waterbirds. In Emu Vol. 105 No 2. CSIRO Publishing on behalf of RAOU. – Milewski, A.V. (2006) ‘Give dues to our world-record bin-bird’. In Wingspan Vol. 16 No.2 June 2006, Birds Australia (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union), Melbourne.
‘Slime mould’ is a not a term that elicits excitement in most people, nor does it conjure up images of great beauty. But slime moulds must be among the most remarkable of organisms! At one stage of their life they are single cell amoeba, whose definition is found in a Dictionary of Zoology, then they combine with others of their kind to form either a plasmodium – or pseudoplasmodium – defined in the Dictionary of Plant Sciences.
My fascination with slime moulds has been growing gradually since first reading about them in books about fungi. They were once placed in the same kingdom as fungi but are now in their own kingdom: the Protozoa.) Their sudden appearance is particularly intriguing. On one occasion I went outside to find three fruiting bodies in various colours of Fuligo septica on logs or stumps about 20-50 metres apart. This left me wondering about the stimulus for their sudden appearance.
In an attempt to find out more about slime moulds I purchased The Social Amoebae: the biology of cellular slime moulds, a small book written by John Tyler Bonner. Bonner (aka the ‘sultan of slime’) is professor emeritus of ecology and evolutionary biology at Princeton University who has worked and written about his ‘beloved slime molds’ for six decades. He writes in the preface that one reason for the book was to clarify in his own mind the complex nature of the subject of his life’s work. But rather than clarifying it for me, the information, initially at least, was bewildering. Then, after reading Virgil Hubregtse’s account of a talk given by Paul George (via the Australia Fungimap project, #28), I realised the reason for my confusion: there are three types of slime moulds!
the Dictyostelids, the cellular slime moulds so eloquently written about by Bonner (featured on the ABC Science Show 29th Aug 2009)
the very obscure Protostelids
and the acellular slime moulds, also known as plasmodial slime moulds or myxomycetes.
The cellular slime moulds are mostly microscopic; the acellular slime moulds are the ones we see.
Myxomycetes: Plasmodial or Acellular Slime Moulds
One of the most frequently encountered acellular slime mould is the aforementioned Fuligo septica. Its common names of either ‘dog vomit‘ or ‘scrambled egg’ slime mould evocatively describe its size and consistency. It appears on rotting logs, stumps or live vegetation during summer, first as a moist brightly coloured (usually yellow) blob, then, as the spores develop, it fades and gradually hardens. It is likely, given that many acellular slime moulds have a globally cosmopolitan distribution, that it was the one that featured in 9th century Chinese writings called ‘Kwei hi‘ which translates to ‘demon droppings. In an area of Mexico the plasmodium is fried and eaten by some of the indigenous people who call it ‘caca de luna‘ i.e. ‘moon’s excrement‘.
Other slime moulds have quite different forms. From a distance Ceratiomyxa fruticulosa is no more than a white splash on rotting stumps and logs, but closer inspection reveals an intricate architecture of miniature icicles. When it first appears Stemonitis axifera resembles a collection of small shiny beads. These gradually elongate and change colour before transforming into a brown fluffy spore-bearing mass. The fruiting body of Lycogala epidendrum, whose common name is ‘wolf’s milk’, are 3 – 15mm orbs of pink, red or orange which gradually change to pinkish grey.
What really got me hooked was finding a colony of exquisite 4mm fruiting bodies resembling tiny deep purple mushrooms that were scattered along the trunk of a dogwood tree (Pomaderris apetala) that had been lying on swampy ground for years, possibly decades. After checking a few websites the distinctive appearance of the slime mould made it easy to identify as Arcyria denudata.
I replaced the slime mould in a shady spot and planned to make regular visits to record its progress. As luck would have it, there was another Arcyria species about a metre away that I could also monitor.
I have learnt quite bit about slime moulds since that encounter with the purple Arcyria. For instance, slime moulds are apparently very sensitive to disturbance (they don’t like rough handling, but they don’t seem to mind loud exclamations of delight on being discovered!) and although a few of the A. denudata fruiting bodies on the sodden dogwood matured, I lost track of most of them and presume they did not cope well with being moved. Another mistake I made was photographing the very early stages which can be similar in different species. For example, many fruiting bodies first appear as bright yellow plasmodia, or a collection of small beads or stalked cylinders of jelly. It is only when these mature that their identifying features become obvious. However in many instances, as with fungi, microscopic examination of spores and other structures is needed for identification.
Surprisingly, there have been only about 1000 species of slime moulds recorded worldwide (in comparison, there are believed to be approximately one million fungi). They reach their peak of abundance in temperate forests and can be found on living and dead trees, rotting logs and other coarse woody debris, leaf litter, herbivore dung and bryophytes. There is even one record of a slime mould growing on a living lizard! The lizard Corytophanes cristatus is a cryptic species found in the forests of eastern Honduras. Its ‘sit and wait’ foraging strategy involving periods of immobility meant that a slime mould Physarum pusillum could colonize its body. This lizard, which also occurs in Mexico and Costa Rica, is the only vertebrate reported to have a plant (a liverwort, Taxilejeunea sp.) occurring on its body.
I was under the impression that the fruiting bodies, many of which are only millimetres high, were delicate ephemeral structures, but some stay around for some time. When you know where to look, you can see quite a few! For instance, in the forest near home I have found numerous old fruiting bodies inside old stumps or in hollow logs. One had been there long enough to have a growth of leafy liverworts on its stem.
It is not only their sudden and sporadic appearance that is fascinating, but also the fact that in their early stages of their life cycle they share some characteristics with animals – i.e. they feed and move about -, while their reproductive stage is similar to that of fungi – i.e. they produce spores.
Acellular slime moulds have two different trophic (feeding) stages. The spores germinate into individual, soil-dwelling, single-nucleus, sometimes flagellated amoebae. The word amoeba comes from the Greek amoiba: to change. It alludes to their ever-changing shape, a result of the expansion and retraction of temporary protrusions on their body called pseudopodia.
The amoebae feed on bacteria and other organic matter, and then divide in two – thus their population increases. Two compatible amoebae fuse to form a zygote, a process that involves the fusion of the protoplasm and the fusion of the nuclei. The diploid zygote feeds, grows and undergoes repeated nuclear division to develop into the plasmodium (pl. plasmodia).
The plasmodia are a single cell with multiple nuclei encased in a thin membrane. Because they can move through very small openings of a few micrometres they are able to exploit the microhabitats within decaying wood. There they feed on bacteria, yeasts, algae, cyanobacteria and fungal hyphae and spores. Eventually they move to the surface of the substrate to form fruiting bodies. This transformation is probably triggered by exhaustion of the food supply, and/or changes in moisture, temperature and pH. Wind disperses the spores in most species although invertebrates undoubtedly also play a part in this.
If conditions are unfavourable plasmodia have the ability to transform to a hard structure (sclerotium) and revert to a plasmodium when favourable conditions return. Similarly, amoeboid cells have the ability to change to microcysts and back again. Sclerotia and microcysts can remain viable for long periods; a strategy that probably ensures their survival in arid and other hostile habitats.
Although slime moulds are usually associated with moist conditions and are most often observed after a bout of rainy weather they are by no means confined to wet habitats. During an expedition to the northern Simpson Desert in 2007, substrates were collected from the Hay River region and taken back to incubate in the lab. Thirty-five species were documented including nine species not previously recorded in Australia. 41% of the species found during the expedition, including one that is considered rare, are also found in the desert of Western Kazakhstan, once again reflecting their cosmopolitan distribution.
Most slime moulds are not slimy, nor do they look like mould; rather, many are exquisitely shaped and quite beautiful. My search for slime moulds continues and while looking for these tiny organisms I have encountered so many other fascinating things. Rotting wood, stumps, logs and leaf litter abound with life!